Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe ...

A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...

CIVICUS speaks with Daniel Simons, Senior Legal Counsel Strategic Defence for Greenpeace International, about the lawsuit ...

Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...

Greenpeace testified that it played only a minor, supporting role in the protests against the pipeline, which it pointed out ...

1 TRESPASS TO LAND Did Defendants trespass on Energy Transfer's land? 1. Greenpeace Inc. Greenpeace Fund Greenpeace International Х YES NO YES Х NO X YES NO If you answered YES as to any of the ...

The verdict of Energy Transfer v. Greenpeace has disturbing implications for freedom of speech. But activists aren’t letting corporates shut them up. If you didn’t follow the proceedings of ...

A column by Winona LaDuke, an Ojibwe writer and economist on Minnesota’s White Earth Reservation. She also is co-curator of ...

Energy Transfer, one of the largest pipeline companies ... The jury agreed and ordered Greenpeace to pay $667 million in damages. From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter ...

Last week, a jury ruled that Greenpeace, a left-wing environmental activist group, must pay more than $660 million to Energy ...

James B. Meigs noted that this lawsuit is the 'first major success in exposing and penalizing the putatively legitimate ...

Energy Transfer, one of the largest pipeline companies ... The jury agreed and ordered Greenpeace to pay $667 million in damages. Greenpeace, which had said it would have to declare bankruptcy ...