The Supreme Court Ducked Another Big Abortion Case. Clarence Thomas Is Livid.
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
US Supreme Court battle: Justice Thomas calls to reevaluate abortion clinic protest rules
The US Supreme Court dealt a setback to abortion opponents, refusing to reconsider a 2000 decision that lets states and cities create protective zones to shield patients from being approached near clinic entrances.
The U.S. Supreme Court avoided deadlock with a fractured 5-3 decision to give Richard Glossip, the Oklahoma death row inmate ...
The court decided not to take the case brought against the government by an Air National Guard member who was paralyzed ...
The George H.W. Bush appointee said service members should be afforded the same chance at relief for government negligence as ...
The Root on MSN1d
Oh Lord, Republicans are Pushing for a Clarence Thomas Statue, But Here’s Why This Should Never HappenAs Republicans are enjoying their majority in both the House and Senate, they are also pushing forth their own (questionable) ...
A 19-year-old has been arrested for the double shooting at Main Event entertainment center in Cobb County on Sunday evening.
In 5-3 decision, the justices set aside Richard Glossip's conviction, saying it may have been based on false testimony.
The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic buffer zone laws, earning a fiery dissent from Justice Thomas.
The Supreme Court bucked its lengthy streak of letting questionable executions move forward and threw out the infamous death ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback